Q1 2026: Investment Grade Private Credit update

Market statistics for the private placement market sourced from Private Placement Monitor, a standard proxy for the investment grade (IG) private credit market. Other market data supplied by Bloomberg.

Markets

The first quarter of 2026 continued to demonstrate strong momentum in the IG private placement market, with new issuance volume exceeding US$40 billion. According to Private Placement Monitor (PPM) data, a proxy for IG private placement issuance, this represented an increase of more than US$10 billion compared to the first quarter of 2025. Infrastructure issuance was particularly strong in March, outpacing corporate activity. Toward quarter end, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and associated ripple effects, including a rise in risk-free rates, dampened issuance activity and contributed to a brief slowdown in primary market volumes. Energy price volatility increased, prompting responses across sectors – for example, fuel surcharges and route optimization in aviation – while several countries implemented measures to conserve energy and water, prioritizing household needs.

Crude oil prices rose substantially during the quarter, with Brent crude fluctuating in the US$100–$110 per barrel range at quarter end, a meaningful increase from the US$60–$70 per barrel range it occupied over the past year, increasing cost pressures across transportation, utilities and consumer staples. While short-term volatility typically has limited immediate credit impact, sustained elevated energy prices can weigh on household disposable income, with pressure on consumer credit portfolios often emerging with an 8–12-month lag. Media scrutiny of private credit intensified during the quarter and pressures remain largely concentrated in select direct lending segments with no signs of systemic credit issues.

Secondary market activity persisted early in the quarter, with January characterized by rollover offerings from routine sellers seeking liquidity and portfolio rebalancing outside of year-end dynamics. Although activity moderated slightly in February and March as investors focused on primary issuance, year-over-year volumes increased over the quarter. Importantly, despite heightened attention on private credit and business development companies (BDCs), the secondary market remained orderly with no evidence of forced selling. In fact, the presence of reverse inquiries, albeit at wider spread levels, highlighted continued institutional confidence in asset quality, management teams and structural protections in BDCs.

Outlook

Looking ahead, the potential for ongoing volatility may create opportunities across both primary and secondary markets for selective capital deployment. We will be looking for greater spread dispersion across sectors and a potential shift in issuance toward industrials and utilities. Maintaining underwriting discipline and a continued focus on structural protections remains critical to identifying attractive opportunities.

In focus

Deeper analysis beyond the private credit headlines

Private credit has become a defining force in capital markets. Over the past decade, it has channeled capital to companies, real assets and infrastructure projects that bank retrenchment left underserved, growing from a niche alternative into a market that now rivals the broadly syndicated loan market in size. Against this backdrop, recent headlines have introduced a note of caution, spotlighting fund redemptions, rising defaults and the potential for AI to disrupt software valuations.

In our view, these developments deserve examination, but they should not be read as a broad indictment of private credit. Much of the turbulence has been concentrated in certain pockets of non-investment grade direct lending in which underwriting has leaned heavily on enterprise value assumptions and payment-in-kind (PIK) accruals have grown as a share of income. The IG private placement market operates under a fundamentally different set of principles, generally with fixed cash-pay income, larger and more seasoned issuers, robust covenant packages and consistent cash recycling through interest, amortization and prepayments. These fundamentally different features warrant examination through a different lens.

Liquidity is one of the most misunderstood dimensions of the current private credit conversation. Recent media coverage has often framed redemption limits or gates for non-traded BDCs and other direct lending funds as evidence of systemic distress. The reality is more straightforward: semi-liquid structures are designed with redemption caps, typically 5% of net asset value (NAV) per quarter, to prevent forced selling of illiquid assets at inopportune times (source: Bloomberg, 2026). When these features are engaged, it means the design is working as intended. The heightened visibility reflects the growing participation of retail investors in direct lending, which amplifies media coverage of features that institutional investors have long accepted as standard. These dynamics are largely understood by the institutional IG private placement market, where investors commit capital for a defined term, generally to match the duration of underlying assets or offset the profile of liabilities. The structure and the investment horizon are aligned by design.

As investments progress through a credit cycle, credit events will occur. Defaults and liability management exercises have risen from unusually low post-pandemic levels in direct lending. In addition, PIK income has become an increasing feature of many direct lending portfolios. While PIK can, in some cases, reflect a mutually agreed deferral, elevated PIK ratios may obscure the quality of a portfolio and can complicate the assessment of manager performance. Moody’s has flagged continued pressure on interest coverage ratios in the leveraged lending market as a key vulnerability in 2026, noting that many non-IG borrowers are operating with coverage ratios that leave limited buffers in a sustained higher-rate environment.

Portfolio-level default figures, moreover, may not tell the full story. Actual loss outcomes depend heavily on structural seniority, covenant protections and the depth of subordinated equity beneath the lender. Dispersion across managers is likely to widen meaningfully over the next 12 months, and recovery rates will vary accordingly.

This is precisely where the IG private placement market stands apart. IG private placements are generally structured as cash-pay instruments: interest is received in cash, principal amortizes on a regular schedule and prepayments generate additional liquidity that can be redeployed at prevailing market rates. Unlike certain direct lending portfolios where PIK can dilute current income and defer capital recycling, IG private credit can deliver a steady, transparent and predictable stream of cash, a meaningful distinction for investors managing liability-driven or income-oriented mandates.

The IG private credit space also spans a diversified set of sectors, including utilities and infrastructure, real assets and established corporate issuers, among others. IG private placements often contain more comprehensive covenant packages, providing an earlier return to the table with the borrower and stronger recourse to preserve capital. This combination of these structural features, together with a spread premium that has historically provided meaningful relative value advantages in comparison to equivalent public credit, means investors are being compensated for their patience without taking on incremental credit risk (source: Bloomberg).

Subject matter expertise further differentiates what a scaled IG private credit platform can deliver. As market participants overall pull back from certain sectors or specific names in response to broad-based concerns, experienced credit teams with deep sector knowledge are positioned to distinguish between fundamental shifts and names experiencing temporary dislocation. The ability to be opportunistic – extending credit on attractive terms when others are cautious, leveraging direct-to-issuer relationships and broad origination networks – is a durable and compounding source of relative value. In the current environment, where heightened scrutiny is causing some participants to step back, that expertise and selectivity matter more than ever.

The question of AI’s impact on private credit has also generated significant commentary, but the scope of direct exposure varies considerably by segment. Software and related services can represent a material share of direct lending portfolios, in some cases as much as a quarter or more, making them more immediately sensitive to valuation compression driven by AI competition or product obsolescence (source: PitchBook, 2026). Equity markets may be pricing this sector divergence faster than credit markets, but credit risk will materialize over time if revenue assumptions prove too aggressive and coverage ratios deteriorate.

IG private credit portfolios, by contrast, tend to be diversified across regulated industries, real assets and established corporate borrowers in which AI disruption risk is more distant and where valuations are anchored by tangible cash flows and hard assets rather than growth multiples. For any borrower with which technology risk is a meaningful factor, the relevant underwriting questions remain consistent: are cash flows durable, is the product embedded in customer workflows, and does the capital structure provide adequate cushion? These are questions that rigorous, asset-specific credit underwriting is well-equipped to answer, underscoring why portfolio-level thematic concentration in a single sector warrants careful scrutiny.

The key takeaway from the current environment is not that private credit should be viewed more skeptically, but that it should be assessed with greater precision. The bifurcation now unfolding across the market, between segments facing genuine credit pressure and those delivering consistent, cash-generating returns, is increasingly apparent to informed investors, and it creates opportunity for those positioned correctly. For the IG private credit market, recent conditions have prompted heightened attention but have potentially also expanded the scope of attractive opportunities. The fundamental value proposition remains intact and increasingly well-differentiated: spread premiums above comparable public credit, broad diversification across sectors and issuers and strong structural protections and covenants.

As competition shifts and headlines drive caution in pockets of the market, investors who remain anchored to structure, underwriting quality and downside protection are, in our view, well-positioned to capture durable relative value beneath today’s headlines.

Sources: Private Placement Monitor, Cleary Gottlieb, Bloomberg, Moody’s, PitchBook, 2026.

© 2026, SLC Management

Any reference to a specific asset does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold or directly invest in it. It should not be assumed that any investment will be profitable or will equal the results of the assets discussed in this document. Any assets referred to herein represent investments of SLC Fixed Income, which are managed on a discretionary and non-discretionary basis for Sun Life's General Account and certain third-party clients. SLC Management is the brand name for the institutional asset management business of Sun Life Financial Inc. (“Sun Life”) under which Sun Life Capital Management (U.S.) LLC in the United States, and Sun Life Capital Management (Canada) Inc. in Canada operate. Sun Life Capital Management (Canada) Inc. is a Canadian registered portfolio manager, investment fund manager, exempt market dealer and in Ontario, a commodity trading manager. Sun Life Capital Management (U.S.) LLC is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser and is also a registered Commodity Trading Advisor and Exempt Commodity Pool Operator with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the Commodity Exchange Act and Members of the National Futures Association. Unless otherwise stated, all figures and estimates provided have been sourced internally and are as of 03/31/2026. Unless otherwise noted, all references to “$” are in U.S. dollars. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Nothing herein constitutes an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities. The information in these materials is provided solely as reference material with respect to the Firm, its people and advisory services business, as an asset management company. Market data and information included herein is based on various published and unpublished sources considered to be reliable but has not been independently verified and there is no guarantee of its accuracy or completeness. This content may present materials or statements which reflect expectations or forecasts of future events. Such forward-looking statements are speculative in nature and may be subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and actual results which could differ significantly from the statements. As such, do not place undue reliance upon such forward-looking statements. All opinions and commentary are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith without legal responsibility. Unless otherwise stated, all figures and estimates provided have been sourced internally and are current as at the date of the paper unless separately stated. All data is subject to change. This information is not intended to provide specific financial, tax, investment, insurance, legal or accounting advice and should not be relied upon and does not constitute a specific offer to buy and/or sell securities, insurance or investment services. Investors should consult with their professional advisors before acting upon any information contained in this paper. An investor may not invest directly in an index. No part of this material may, without SLC Management’s prior written consent, be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) distributed to any person that is not an employee, officer, director, or authorized agent of the recipient. This material is intended for institutional investors only. It is not for retail use or distribution to individual investors. Nothing in this presentation should (i) be construed to cause any of the operations under SLC Management to be an investment advice fiduciary under the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or similar law, (ii) be considered individualized investment advice to plan assets based on the particular needs of a plan or (iii) serve as a primary basis for investment decisions with respect to plan assets. Data presented in this article have been calculated internally based on external market data sourced from Private Placement Monitor and other sources. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Investment-grade credit ratings of our private placements portfolio assets are based on a proprietary, internal credit rating methodology that was developed using both externally purchased and internally developed models. This methodology is reviewed regularly. More details can be shared upon request. There is no guarantee that the same rating(s) would be assigned to portfolio asset(s) if they were independently rated by a major credit ratings organization. Investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Diversification does not guarantee against loss or ensure a profit.

SLC-20260427-5432090